
CrossCountry Mortgage Enforces Payment from Former Loan Officers Over Non-Solicitation Clause
Edited by Hollis Keystead
Mortgages & Policy · Updated October 31, 2026
CrossCountry Mortgage is reportedly demanding payments from former loan officers (LOs) for each refinanced loan associated with their previous customers. The company is invoking a two-year non-solicitation agreement, which restricts former LOs from soliciting business from their past clients. This move has raised concerns about its implications for the mortgage industry and the relationships between lenders and loan officers.
Share this story
Why it matters
- ✓Home buyers may face limited options if former loan officers are unable to assist them due to non-solicitation agreements.
- ✓The enforcement of such agreements may lead to a more competitive environment among lenders, potentially affecting loan terms and availability.
- ✓Investors in the mortgage sector should be aware of potential shifts in workforce dynamics and customer relationships that could impact business operations.
CrossCountry Mortgage Enforces Payment from Former Loan Officers Over Non-Solicitation Clause
CrossCountry Mortgage is taking a firm stance against former loan officers (LOs) by demanding payments for refinanced loans tied to their previous customers. According to documents obtained by HousingWire, the company is seeking 75 basis points (bps) for each loan refinanced by these former LOs. This enforcement of a two-year non-solicitation agreement has raised eyebrows within the mortgage industry, prompting discussions about its implications for both home buyers and loan officers.
Background on Non-Solicitation Agreements
Non-solicitation agreements are contracts that prevent employees from soliciting clients or customers after leaving a company. In the context of the mortgage industry, these agreements are designed to protect a lender's client base from being poached by former employees. CrossCountry Mortgage's decision to invoke such an agreement highlights the company's commitment to safeguarding its business interests, but it also raises questions about the fairness and practicality of these restrictions.
The Financial Demand
The demand for 75 bps on each refinanced loan represents a significant financial burden for former loan officers. If a former LO has a substantial number of clients who refinance their loans, the cumulative cost could be considerable. This financial pressure may discourage former LOs from engaging with their past clients, potentially leading to a disconnect between borrowers and the professionals who previously assisted them.
Implications for Home Buyers
For home buyers, the enforcement of non-solicitation agreements could limit their access to familiar loan officers who understand their financial situations and preferences. If former LOs are unable to reach out to their past clients, home buyers may find themselves navigating the mortgage process without the guidance of trusted advisors. This could lead to a less personalized experience and potentially less favorable loan terms.
Impact on the Mortgage Industry
The actions of CrossCountry Mortgage may set a precedent within the mortgage industry. If other lenders follow suit, it could lead to a more competitive environment where loan officers are hesitant to maintain relationships with their clients post-employment. This could result in a shift in how loan officers operate, potentially prioritizing short-term gains over long-term client relationships.
Reactions from Industry Professionals
While the documents reveal CrossCountry Mortgage's intentions, the broader industry response remains to be seen. Some industry professionals may view this as a necessary measure to protect business interests, while others may criticize it as overly restrictive and detrimental to client relationships. The balance between protecting business interests and fostering client loyalty will be a critical discussion point moving forward.
Conclusion
CrossCountry Mortgage's demand for payments from former loan officers under a non-solicitation agreement raises important questions about the future of client relationships in the mortgage industry. As home buyers may face challenges in accessing familiar loan officers, the implications of this enforcement could ripple through the market, affecting how lenders and loan officers interact with clients. The situation warrants close attention as it unfolds, particularly for those involved in the mortgage process.
Sources
Newsletter
Your weekly property signal. No spam.
Comments
Log in with
Loading comments…
More in Mortgage

Silvio Tavares Resigns as VantageScore CEO; Anthony Hutchinson Appointed Interim Leader
Silvio Tavares has stepped down as CEO of VantageScore Solutions, a key player in the credit…
18h ago

Mortgage Applications See Modest Rebound Amid Falling Rates
Mortgage applications increased by 3.4% for the week ending October 23, as mortgage rates fell for…
18h ago

Pennymac Reports $29M Profit Amid Cost-Cutting and Leadership Changes
Pennymac has announced a profit of $29 million for the third quarter of 2026, attributed to…
1d ago

First Horizon, Nations Lending, and Planet Announce Leadership Changes
This week, several notable leadership appointments were made in the mortgage industry, including a…
1d ago